Skin Care

LiLash – the Final Update

Ok, so as you all know I’ve been using LiLash for the past 2 months, and I am loving it!!  My eyelashes are way longer than they were when I started.  It took about 2 weeks to start to see a difference, and now the length on them is very noticeable!  LiLash is the  Period.   And yes, I will keep this as part of my beauty regime.  The web site says that you can use it just 3 or so times a week once you have the lashes that you want.

I do have this in stock at the salon!  Come in and get yours today!

LiLash – after 2 months


LiLash – Before


The LiLash Update

Alrighty – so it’s been 4 weeks since my last LiLash post, and 4 weeks since I have been using LiLash. And, I have to say, this stuff is working!  My lashes are visibly longer, even without mascara.  I have been using LiLash every day, sometimes twice a day, so it’s just become part of my regular routine. I’ll do another follow up in about 4 more weeks and show you the final results!  I do have a few left in stock at the salon, it’s selling like hotcakes!

My lashes today…

Here’s my eyelashes just 4 weeks ago….

The LiLash Experiment

Once again, I’m on the hunt for that perfect lash serum that gives me the ultimate long, curly lashes that I so desire – without the costly prescription Latisse or Lumigan.  Yes, I’m really that vain. A while ago, I was using Enormous Lash, and I got fairly decent results with it.  But, I’m kinda bored with it, and I want something new.

So, enter LiLash. The company claims that “LiLash is the world’s most popular purified eyelash serum, giving you the sexy lashes you have always wanted.”  Well, I’ll be the judge of that!  But, the before and after pics after using LiLash for 6 weeks do look impressive…

So, I’m putting my own teensy-weensy lashes out there for the world to see – my before pics.  With mascara, I thank you.  I’ll keep using LiLash for 6 weeks and hopefully by the end, my eyes will look as hot and sexy as this serum claims they will!





An Update from Doug Schoon – UV Lamps are SAFE!!!!

Thanks to good old Dr. Oz and various other TV shows, magazine articles and just overall bad press, UV lamps for gel nails have gotten a very bad rep in the last year.  But, we have stood behind our lamps, knowing that they are safe for you, the loyal, nail-loving client.  And, now we have proof – yes, PROOF! – from the industry guru himself, Doug Schoon.

Here is his study on the safety of various lamps and what he has proven to be safe.  Please take the few minutes to read this, I know it’s a little long, but it’s well worth the read to educate not only yourself but your friends too.

  • Not only does this study provide strong evidence that UV nail lamps are safe as used in nail salons, the researchers found the UV nail lamps were even safer than they expected!!!

                                                                                                                                 “UV Nail Lamps Tested and Found Safe by Two Leading UV Experts”

Dr. John Dowdy and Dr. Robert Sayre By Doug Schoon


July, 2013 – A comprehensive scientific study concerning the safety of UV nail units (aka UV nail lamps) has just been published and it is VERY important for several reasons:

  1. This is the first study to compare six major brands of UV nail units, including three that use UV producing LEDs as the UV source.
  2. It is also the first study to adhere to the official internationally accepted standard for UV source testing (ANSI RP-27) which is determined to the superior method for evaluating UV nail units.
  3. This independent study was performed by two world leading UV/Skin researchers Dr. John Dowdy and Dr. Robert Sayre. Dr. Sayre is the inventor of the SPF rating system for sun screens and both are considered world-class experts and scientific leaders in the field of research related to UV and skin exposure.
  4. The results demonstrate the safety of a wide range of top selling UV nail units (lamps) and show they are well within accepted safe levels.

    Analysis and Quotations:

  • This study is superior to any previously performed testing on UV curing nail units, because it follows the correct scientific protocols and uses the proper testing equipment necessary to comprehensively evaluate the safety of UV nail lamps. Very few will read this highly technical paper (see link below), so I’ve provided my analysis and commentary, along with pertinent quotations from the study. To be clear, only the italicized texts in quotation are found in the Dowdy/Sayer paper and everything else is my commentary about the reported results from this important study.
  • Not only does this study provide strong evidence that that UV nail lamps are safe as used in nail salons, the researchers found the UV nail lamps were even safer than they expected, “All of the various UV nail lamps submitted for evaluation were found to be significantly less hazardous than might have been anticipated based on the initial concerns raised…”
  • The paper cited important research demonstrating the natural nail plate is a very efficient blocker of UV, protecting the nail bed, “… the UV exposure risks to the nail bed is comparable to that of skin protected by high SPF topical sunscreen.” Research studies indicate the nail plate’s natural UV resistance is comparable to the UV resistance provided by an SPF 40 sunscreen.
  • Also cited was additional research to demonstrate that the backside of the hand is 4 times more resistant to UV than the forehead or cheek. It is 3 1/2 times more resistant than the a person’s back, making the backside of the hand THE most UV resistant part of the body, “The dorsum [backside] of the hand is the most UV acclimatized, photo adapted, and UV-resistant body site.”
  • The study provided conclusive evidence to demonstrate that UV nail lamps are NOT like tanning beds, “When UV nail lamps evaluated in this report are compared together with these earlier sunlamp computations, we find that the UV nail lamps are vastly less hazardous”.
  • Because the measured UV exposure was so low, a person could go to their workplace and once every day put their hand under a UV nail lamp for 25 minutes and this would STILL be within the “permissible daily occupational exposure limits” for workers, according to the applicable international standard (ANSI RP-27). Obviously, salon client exposure is much, much lower and just a tiny fraction in comparison and it must be consider also that client exposure is only twice per month. This scientific paper provides powerful evidence to further support the safety of UV nail lamps; either traditional tube or LED-style.
  • This study also demonstrates that risks for development of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) are very low when compared to normal noon sunlight. Of the types of UV that can cause NMSC, this study found that UV nail lamp expose skin to somewhere between 11-46 times less NMSC related exposure expected from spending equal time in natural noon sun light, “…the UV nail lamps had 11-46 times less NMSC effective irradiance than an overhead 1 atmosphere solar spectrum [normal noon sunlight].”
  • These researchers put things into perspective when they concluded that it is very unlikely that anyone could become overexposed to UV through normal use of the nail lamps tested since they considered it, “…highly improbable that even the most dedicated nail salon client or avid home user would approach this level of exposure.”
  • The researchers noted this “Notwithstanding the comparatively trivial UV risks associated with UV nail lamps there are some reasonable and potentially serious concerns involving these devices that should be discussed.” Special care should be taken in cases where potential users are taking medications that increase UV sensitivity. These individual have been, “… advised against venturing into natural sunlight without proper protection and should be cautious about using UV nail lamps.” Of course, that is sensible advice that should be heeded!
  • What was the MOST significant risk these scientists identified? Concern that the incorrect replacement lamp/bulb may be inserted into the UV nail unit, e.g. those emitting UV-B or UV-C could be harmful to the skin if accidently inserted. Also, the incorrect lamp/bulb can lead to improper curing of the UV gel. For several reasons, it is VERY important that UV lamps/bulbs are replaced with the exactly the same UV lamp/bulb that was supplied with the UV nail unit when it was purchased. In other words, use ONLY the UV nail unit manufacturer’s recommended original equipment (OEM) lamp/bulb replacement.
  • When sharing his opinions based on this nail lamps testing Dr. Sayre has said that some, “Physicians are grossly exaggerating exposures.” And of UV nail lamps he says, “…this UV source probably belongs in the least risky of all categories.” And, “UV nail lamps are safer than natural sunlight or sunlamps.”

    I wholeheartedly agree with these statements and the results of this study. There are several other studies also demonstrating the safety of UV nail lamps. Now this information needs to get into the hands of physicians so they can make proper recommendations based on science, not misinformation. The same goes for the media news outlets. You can do your part, by sharing this Educational Update with everyone you know, including your clients. If you see unfair misinformation being propagated, please share this information. The Dowdy/Sayre study should convince any reasonable person about the safety of UV nail lamps.

    If you’re curious and want to learn more about UV nail lamps, go to my website “”. There you can view free webinars, articles, safety-related brochures, links to other UV nail unit (lamp) studies, and other recent Education Updates about both types of UV nail lamps, traditional and LED.

    Dr. Dowdy and Sayre’s full text scientific paper is available (and worth readying) from this link to the publisher’s website

    Dowdy, J. C. and Sayre, R. M. (2013), Photobiological Safety Evaluation of UV Nail Lamps. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 89: 961–967. doi: 10.1111/php.12075


Nail Diseases and Disorders

Okay, I know.  This is a very serious and kinda gross topic.  But this is all very good info to know, especially if we happen to have a strange looking nail and we really don’t know what’s happening.

Our bodies host a variety of microorganisms, some of which are beneficial to us.  These microorganisms also include bacteria and fungi.  Fungal infections are caused by microscopic plants that live on our skin and on the dead tissue of our hair and nails.  The following list contains the more common nail irregularities, diseases and disorders.  For information on nail problems not listed here, please refer to the links at the bottom of this page.

Please be aware that Nail Technicians are only licensed to beautify the hands, and not to diagnose or treat nail diseases and disorders.  Please seek the advice of your physician or dermatologist for a proper diagnosis and medical treatment.

Paronychia infections of the nail fold can be caused by bacteria, fungi and some viruses. The proximal and lateral nail folds act as a barrier, or seal, between the nail plate and the surrounding tissue.  If a tear or a break occurs in this seal, the bacterium can easily enter.  this type of infection is characterized by pain, redness and swelling of the nail folds.  People who have their hands in water for extended periods may develop this condition, and it is highly contagious.



Pseudomonas bacterial infection can occur between the natural nail plate and the nail bed, and/or between an artificial nail coating and the natural nail plate.  Many people have been led to believe that the classic ‘green’ discoloration of this type of infection is some type of mold.  In actuality, mold is not a human pathogen.  The discoloration is simply a by-product of the infection and is caused primarily by iron compounds. Pseudomonas thrive in moist places; it feeds off the dead tissue and bacteria in the nail plate, while the moisture levels allow it to grow.  The after effects of this infection will cause the nail plate to darken and soften underneath an artificial coating.  The darker the discoloration, the deeper into the nail plate layers the bacteria has traveled.  If the bacteria has entered between the nail plate and the nail bed, it will cause the same discolorations and may also cause the nail plate to lift from the nail bed.




fungal or yeast infection which results in Onychomycosis, can  invade through a tear in the proximal and lateral nail folds as well as the eponychium.  This type of infection is characterized by onycholysis (nail plate separation) with evident debris under the nail plate.  It normally appears white or yellowish in color, and may also change the texture and shape of the nail.  The fungus digests the keratin protein of which the nail plate is comprised.  As the infection progresses, organic debris accumulates under the nail plate often discoloring it.  Other infectious organisms may be involved, and if left untreated, the nail plate may separate from the nail bed and crumble off.



Tinea Unguis, or ringworm of the nails, is characterized by nail thickening, deformity, and eventually results in nail plate loss.



Onychatrophia is an atrophy or wasting away of the nail plate which causes it to lose its luster, become smaller and sometimes shed entirely.  Injury or disease may account for this irregularity.



Onychogryposis are claw-type nails that are characterized by a thickened nail plate and are often the result of trauma.  This type of nail plate will curve inward, pinching the nail bed and sometimes require surgical intervention to relieve the pain.



Onychorrhexis are brittle nails which often split vertically, peel and/or have vertical ridges.  This irregularity can be the result of heredity, the use of strong solvents in the workplace or the home, including household cleaning solutions.  Although oil or paraffin treatments will re-hydrate the nail plate, one may wish to confer with a physician to rule out disease.



Onychauxis is evidenced by over-thickening of the nail plate and may be the result of internal disorders — seek medical advice.



Leuconychia is evident as white lines or spots in the nail plate and may be caused by tiny bubbles of air that are trapped in the nail plate layers due to trauma.  This condition may be hereditary and no treatment is required as the spots will grow out with the nail plate.



Beau’s Lines are nails that are characterized by horizontal lines of darkened cells and linear depressions.  This disorder may be caused by trauma, illness, malnutrition or any major metabolic condition, chemotherapy or other damaging event, and is the result of any interruption in the protein formation of the nail plate. Seek a physicians diagnosis.



Koilonychia is usually caused through iron deficiency anemia.  these nails show raised ridges and are thin and concave.  Seek a physicians advice and treatment.



Melanonychia are vertical pigmented bands, often described as nail ‘moles’, which usually form in the nail matrix.  Seek a physicians care should you suddenly see this change in the nail plate.  It could signify a malignant melanoma or lesion.  Dark streaks may be a normal occurrence in dark-skinned individuals, and are fairly common.



Psoriasis of the nails is characterized by raw, scaly skin and is sometimes confused with eczema.  When it attacks the nail plate, it will leave it pitted, dry, and it will often crumble.  The plate may separate from the nail bed and may also appear red, orange or brown, with red spots in the lunula.  Do not attempt salon treatments on a client with Nail Psoriasis. Consult with a dermatologist for diagnosis and treatment.



MMA Damaged Nails:  D. Tuggle, owner of The Nail Academy, Jamaica, Queens, N.Y., submitted this picture of nails damaged by MMA to the BeautyTech Web Site and allowed it to be added to this page.  MMA (methyl methacrylate) is a liquid monomer used for acrylic nails by some unscrupulous salons even though it is considered by and prohibited by the FDA to be a poisonous and deleterious substance.  According to Dianna Bonn of Indiana, as of May 1, 1999, 23 states have banned this chemical from being used in nail salons.  MMA nails are very rigid and do not bend or have the flexibility to break.  When MMA does finally break, it will break the natural nail with it, causing severe nail damage.



Vertical Ridges are also characteristic of aging, although are not limited to the aged or elderly.  The nail plate grows forward on the nail bed in a ‘rail and groove’ effect, much like a train rides on its’ tracks.  As we age, the natural oil and moisture levels decline in the nail plate, and this rail and groove effect becomes apparent.  Ridged nails will improve through re-hydration of the nail plate with twice daily applications of a good quality nail and cuticle oil containing Jojoba and Vitamin E.



The aforementioned nail irregularities are among those I have been witness to during my years in the salon.  There are others that only a trained dermatologist will be able to diagnose and treat.  Some are contagious, and some are the result of injury or illness.  Physicians will sometimes examine your fingernails because many diseases will appear as various changes in the nail plate.  Any change in the nail plate could be cause for concern, whether it is a simple splinter hemorrhage that appears as a tiny black line in the nail plate, or a drastic change.  Nail technicians are trained to beautify the hands/feet and are not allowed to diagnose nail diseases or to treat them in the salon.  For your nail health, seek the diagnosis and recommendation of a knowledgeable dermatologist.

10 Nail Myths – Put to Rest

I LOVE Doug Schoon.  Doug Schoon is an internationally-recognized scientist, author and educator with over 30 years experience in the cosmetic, beauty and personal care industry. He is a leading industry authority, known for his technical and regulatory work that has helped shape the beauty industry.  He always has our back when it comes to crazy, nail-related issues that pop in the media and magazines.  Now, here he is again, ready to dispel the top 10 nail related myths.  It’s a bit long, but well worth the read.





“Ten Top Myths Related to Artificial Nails” by Doug Schoon

Myth 1: Nails Need to Breath.

  • No, they don’t! There is no reason to believe that nails need to “breathe”. Nails aren’t alive and don’t have lungs nor do they have any ability to absorb air into the nail plate. This myth makes no sense on many levels! In short, nails do NOT require an external air supply and do not breathe or exhale. 100% of the oxygen needed by the nail matrix to create a new nail plate comes from the blood stream and 0% comes from the outside world.
  • Everything the nail plate needs to properly grow and function is delivered and/or removed by the blood flow to the matrix area and nail bed. The matrix is where the nail plate is created from nutrients which can ONLY be delivered by the blood stream. Neither “air” nor “nutrients” can be absorbed or “fed” to the nail plate from any external source.
  • Moisture and natural nail oils leave the nail bed and pass through the nail plate at slower than normal rates, but they aren’t “trapped”. The nail plate’s moisture content is increased by 10-15%, and the oil content increases only slightly; both serves to increase the flexibility of the natural nail plate.
  • Waste products are removed from the matrix area and surrounding tissues by the blood as well, and are not released into the nail plate. Normal, healthy nail plates would continue to grow and thrive in a completely air-free environment, as long as a healthy flow of blood to the nail is maintained, so clearly… nails don’t need to breathe!
  • Myth 2: Nails need to take a break from enhancements.
    • Not true! Nothing is gained by removing artificial nail enhancements or coatings for a few weeks or months before reapplying them. Since the nails do not need to “breathe”, no benefit is gained by waiting to reapply artificial nail enhancements or coatings, which includes nail polish. Nor does it make sense to assume the nails only need to breathe “every once-in-a-while”. This faulty reasoning is not supported by the facts.
    • However as a general rule if the nail plate or surrounding skin shows signs of moderate to serious damage, injury, infection or adverse skin reactions, nail enhancements should be not be applied. Why? In most countries, including the US, nail technicians are only permitted to provide cosmetic services on healthy skin and nails. Unhealthy nail conditions are “medical conditions” which should be examined by a doctor (or podiatrist) who can provide a proper diagnosis and treatment, if required. Nail technicians are not licensed to practice medicine. In cases of adverse skin reactions, discontinue use until the client’s doctor can be consulted as to the actual causes and possible solutions.

Myth 3: UV gels are better for your nails than acrylics.

  • Absolutely false! Every type of UV gel nails and all types of so-called “acrylics” (aka liquid/powder) nail enhancements are made from acrylic ingredients and are cured by acrylic chemistry, therefore both of these types of nail enhancement coatings are just as “acrylic” as the other, regardless of how they are marketed. Other than marketing claims and application procedures, the only real differences between these two types of systems are in the way they harden (polymerize).
  • UV gels utilize a UV sensitive curing agent to harden the nail coating, while liquid/powder systems use heat sensitive curing agents to achieve the same end result. A UV sensitive curing agent could be placed into a liquid/powder system and cured via UV nail lamps and the reverse is also true; a heat sensitive curing agent could be placed into a UV gel and these could be cured without UV. Of course, neither of these makes sense for salon products, which is why this isn’t done, but the point remains… these two types of systems are very similar and one is NOT any better for the nail or safer than the other. This is because “both” UV gels and liquid/powder systems are safe when used per manufacturer instructions and “neither” will harm the natural nail when properly applied, maintained and removed by trained professionals.
  • Remember, wearing any type of enhancement or coating can lead to nail damage IF the nail technician improperly applies the nail coating or if they (or their clients) improperly remove them. Nail enhancement and other nail coating products are safe for the natural nail if properly applied, maintained and removed. No type of artificial nail is safer or better for the natural nail than another. If nail damage occurs while wearing enhancements, this is usually a result of over-filing or other improper application or removal procedures. To prevent this, nail professionals should educate themselves about how to work in a manner that protects the natural nail from damage.

    Myth 4: Nail coatings are bad for the nails.

  • This is NOT correct. Nail coatings don’t harm the nail plate and any nail damage is usually a result of improper application and/or removal. If the nail plate underneath the enhancement is much thinner than the area of new nail growth, this strongly indicates excessive filing with a manual or electric file. Overly aggressive filing causes the majority of nail plate damage seen in salons. This isn’t done just in discount salons, it happens even in high end salons and is indicative of an improperly trained nail professional.
  • If upon removal the plates are not any thinner, but feel like they are overly flexible, this does NOT indicate the nails are “weaker”. Instead, this is a temporary effect created by an increased moisture content of the nail plate. Nail coatings increase the moisture content of the plate by 10-15% and this can last up to 12-24 hours after coating removal; after

which the moisture content returns to normal, as will the nail plate’s normal level of


  • When the nail surface is covered with dry looking white patches, this is usually due to

    improper removal, e.g. scraping or peeling nail coatings from the nail plate. Soaking the natural nail for even a few minutes in acetone or water will temporarily soften the surface making it temporarily more susceptible to damage from wooden or metal implements that pry, push or force the remaining residual nail coatings from the nail plate. Instead, a good rule to follow is, “Use the utmost care for 60 minutes after immersing natural nails in any liquid for more than 60 seconds.”

  • Other damage, e.g. onycholysis, is also usually caused by improper filing or removal techniques. For more information on avoiding nail damage see, “Don’t Let This Happen to Your Clients”,
  • Infections do occur, but they are relatively uncommon and can be easily avoided by practicing proper cleaning and disinfection. For more information see “Guidelines for Cleaning Manicuring Equipment”,
  • The facts are, when artificial enhancements or coatings are carefully and properly applied, maintained, and removed by a trained, skilled, and knowledgeable nail professional- they will not cause nail damage! The vast majority of damaged nail plates are caused by improper use- over filing and/or scraping the nail plate to remove products or by client nail abuse, e.g. picking or prying off nail coatings.

    Myth 5- Medications cause artificial nails to lose adhesion and lift.

    • In general, taking a medication for a month or two isn’t going to affect adhesion of artificial nails or coatings to the nail plates. The same is true for birth control or other over-the- counter (OTC) medications. These aren’t likely to adversely affect the nail plate, either. Generally when people are taking medications over a long term, it is because their body isn’t functioning normally. It is more likely that their illness is what’s affecting the nails, not the medication. The health of the natural nail is often a window into the health of the individual.
    • Chemotherapy is often given for long periods and is an example of medications that can adversely affect the natural nail and may contribute to adhesion loss. OTC medicines and other types of medications taken for short periods (e.g. antibiotics) are unlikely to cause adhesion loss.
    • Anesthetic given during surgery is sometimes blamed for nail problems. Since many people are leery of medication of any type, they jump to this conclusion quickly. Even so, it is FAR more likely that nail growth would be affected by the accident/illness and/or the fact the body is in recovery from surgery.

• In short, nail techs should NOT suspect medications until all other potential sources of the problem have been investigated and ruled out. Medications are RARELY the cause of artificial nail adhesion loss. Keep in mind that these problems may also be caused by something the client is doing, e.g. a sudden lifestyle change.

Myth 6- Vitamins and nutrients absorb into the nail to make them stronger and healthier.

  • As described above, vitamins or nutrients can NOT be fed to the nail plate externally and in many countries it is not legal to make such claims. Vitamins and/or nutrients only make nail plates stronger or healthier when they are ingested in foods and delivered to the nail via the blood stream. In the US and other places, it is against the law for a cosmetic to claim to provide nutritional benefits or value. Only foods can provide nutrition to the body, not cosmetics!
  • To be clear, some nail oils use “vitamin E”, but its function is NOT for nutritional purposes or strengthening. The proper cosmetic label name for Vitamin E is “tocopherol”. Tocopherol or one of its related derivatives (e.g. tocopherol acetate) is used as an antioxidant to help protect the nail plate keratin from damage caused by environmental exposure (e.g. cleaners, hand washing, gardening). As long as no nutritional benefits are claimed, this is an appropriate cosmetic claim since there is strong science to support Vitamin E’s antioxidant abilities,

    Myth 7- Nail oil applied directly to a fresh nail enhancement will cause lifting.

• This is false, when the enhancement is properly applied; if not properly applied then this can be true. When properly applied, artificial nail coatings form a tight seal with the nail plate, therefore nail oils cannot get underneath the coating to cause separation and lifting. The benefit of these natural oils is that they can penetrate into the surface of the nail enhancement to increase the nail coating’s flexibility and durability. Penetrating nail oils should be applied daily, to keep the enhancement flexible and beautiful and to condition the surrounding living tissue. If the artificial nail enhancement was improperly applied, there may be small areas of pre-existing separation between the coating and the nail plate (delamination). When this occurs, nail oils may seep underneath the coating to cause lifting. Even so, there are clear and significant benefits to using nail oils on natural nails and artificial nail coatings. If their use leads to increased lifting of the enhancements, don’t discontinue use of the nail oil. Instead, carefully reexamine your techniques and ensure you are performing careful and proper nail preparation, including nail surface cleansing and properly applying and curing the nail enhancement or coating products.


Myth 8- MMA is dangerous and that is why it shouldn’t be used to make artificial nails.

  • This is false! Methyl methacrylate monomer (MMA) is used all around the world for dental prosthetics, contact lenses, and is even implanted into the body as a bone cement, so the effect of exposure to humans is well understood. MMA is NOT considered to be a cancer- causing agent nor does it damage unborn fetuses. These are myths! Even so, there are several reasons to avoid MMA monomer as a nail coating.
  • MMA nail products do not adhere well to the nail plate, so nail technicians must shred the surface of the nail plate with an abrasive, coarse grit file, causing thinning and weakening in order to ensure the enhancements adhere to the nail plate. Traditional products are designed to adhere to the natural nail plate without the need to over file the nail plate.
  • MMA creates the hardest and most rigid nail enhancements. So, they are very difficult to break. If jammed or caught, the overly filed and thinned natural nail plate is much more likely to break than the MMA enhancement. This can lead to serious nail damage and possible subsequent bacterial infection.
  • MMA enhancements are extremely difficult to remove, because of the filing techniques used to make them adhere and because they don’t easily dissolve in product removers. Therefore, MMA enhancements are usually pried from the nail plate, creating still more damage to the overly thinned nail plate.
  • The information above applies ONLY to MMA monomer. Powders containing MMA should really be called PMMA (poly methyl methacrylate). PMMA has completely different chemical structure/properties and is considered safe for use in artificial nails. PMMA in a sheet form is called PlexiglasTM and LuciteTM. For more factual information see “MMA Information”,

    Myth 9: You should wear a mask when you do nails.

    • False, if you are working with a source capture ventilation system (SCV); you don’t want or need to use a face mask. Even a high quality, properly fitting N-95 dust mask won’t work as well as a source capture ventilation system. Why? When properly fitted, an N-95 dust mask WILL protect against inhalation of tiny airborne dust particles, but NOT vapors. SCV systems prevent exposure by collecting both dusts and vapors- keeping both out of the nail technician’s breathing zone and salon air.
    • When properly maintained and the carbon filters are changed regularly, SCV systems are a great way to help ensure salon air quality remains safe and everyone is breathing comfortably during working hours. Several dust collecting systems are great too and in general, I do recommend their use in salons. Even so, dust collection systems should be used in conjunction with another ventilation system which lowers exposure to vapors. Both dusts and vapors must be properly controlled. SVC systems do both, which is why I fully support their use in salons.

Myth 10: Nail technicians don’t need to learn about the science behind natural and artificial nails.

• What? That’s ridiculous; the biggest myth of them all! The best artists know their paints and canvas, just as sculptors know their chisels and stones and a master woodworker could tell you all the intricacies of wood. Wouldn’t it benefit any nail technicians to have a deeper understanding of the natural nail and nail products? Understanding both the anatomy and microscopic structure of the nail plate is necessary for anyone who provides nail services. Image what you could do if you understood the science behind nail products and how they all work? Well, you can! It’s not hard, in fact it is easy and absolutely fascinating! Want to learn more? Here’s how you can start your journey of learning

Oh Dr. Oz. Whatever will we do with you?

I’m sure most of you have seen the episode of Dr. Oz where, once again, he bashed the nail industry.  Let me say, I am getting sooooo tired of a few bad techs ruining it for all of us.  Yes, it is unfortunate that there are nail places out there that are not clean, where the techs are not properly trained or even licensed, and if they are not careful, can do damage to your nails.

However, this does not mean that all of us are bad.  In fact, there are a large number of us that take great pride in our work, cleanliness and ongoing training.  Sadly, it is buyer beware.  If you go to a place that only charges $30 for a set of nails, you get what you pay for.  Seeking out a properly trained tech that will not mistreat your nails is key.

I LOVE this post from nail guru Holly -aka FingerNailFixer…  Hopefully this answers a few questions, and clears some things up.


The first claim is danger from the UV lamp. If reports from a doctor are sufficient evidence then here are some quotes from doctors as well as evidence from scientific testing in research facilities not related to the beauty industry:

According to Dr. Robert M. Sayre, Ph.D., of Rapid Precision Testing Laboratories one of the creators of the SPF rating system: “UV Nail Lamps are safer than natural sunlight or sunlamps.” According to Dr. Sayre: “People who are indoors have little to no skin risk due to long-term exposure to fluorescent lighting. People who sunbathe or work outdoors have real risks of excessive UV exposure, the cause of sunburn and skin cancer.” Hands get more UV exposure holding the steering wheel of a car or talking on a cell phone outside than they do from the use of UV nail lamps.
“One would need 250 years of weekly nail sessions to equal one treatment in a tanning bed.” Dr Markova & Dr Weinstock (I do not post this comment to bash tanning, merely to give a comparison that people can relate to.)
Here’s a great link to the facts about UV nail lamp safety:
LED is less dangerous than UV. Both of these types of light have UV output, they simply have different types of bulbs. LED lamps put out a higher intensity of UVA in order to provide faster curing times. As evidenced by the quotes and report above, neither is causing damage.
The next claim is allergies. Can you become allergic to products used on your nails? Yes, just as you can become allergic to food you eat, perfume you use, flowers you smell, and pretty much anything in your environment that you come into contact with regularly. Can you prevent an allergy? Yes, by making sure that products are used per manufacturers’ instructions. No polish should touch the skin; it should only be applied to the nail iteself. Avoiding contact with the skin during application and using the lamp calibrated to properly cure the product will help prevent overexposure that can lead to an allergy.
The third claim is infection. Nail services should not require a Tylenol or a Band-Aid! Living tissue should not be cut and the thin ridge of skin at the base of the nail is living tissue. This ridge of skin known as the eponychium should not be aggressively pushed back nor removed as it helps create a seal that protects the matrix producing the nail cells. Infections can arise from dirty implements or files as well as cut skin. Finding a salon that follows the industry standard in sanitation, disinfection, and procedures is the first step toward a healthy nail service of any kind. Be proactive and let your salon guests know what you do to keep them safe — how you clean your tools, that they get a new file each time, etc.
The fourth claim is damage. Do nail products themselves damage the nails? No, improper care of the nails causes damage. Some damage can be caused by an undereducated professional such as using a metal pusher or nipper to remove nail coatings from the nail. Damage can also occur with overfilling of the natural nail. What our guests also need to be aware of is that improper home care can damage the nails as well. For instance peeling or picking off a nail coating takes part of the nail plate leaving the nail thinner and possibly uneven. Buffing the nails excessively at home will thin them as well, and choosing not to condition them in any manner allows them to be more susceptible to being dry and brittle.



I’m sharing a photo of nails that have had manicures using a UV lamp for over a year on a 90-year-old client so you can see the condition of her natural nail as well as share the photo until you can take some of your own.   Face this false stories with facts. I hope this helps, hang in there!

— Holly